Index of all articles, click here
By Luc Loranhe (2006)
When ideologies become legal systems, this is when they become real. Before that, they are just fantasies.
According to the extremist views of feminazis, practically every sexual act by men is a form of rape. When such theories were first printed in the 1980s, most readers were inclined to take this assessment as "figuratively speaking", and the books just as literature. But feminazis didn't consider their assessment "figurative". They meant it verbally.
And these feminazi theories had appeal in the eyes of other women who had dissatisfying experiences with men, and whose minds were set on revenge against men per se.
In the world today, what was once thought of as a strange theory, has stealthily made its way into the legal systems of many countries.
And it's not just that men in those parts of the world that developed in line with US-American cultural dictates are increasingly drawn before courts on charges of rape or sexual molestation. Many men everywhere have come to realize how easily they could be accused and now behave much more in line with the rules of female sexual partners.
Males now feel much more vulnerable than they did just two decades ago, and this has resulted in strongly modified behavioral patterns, designed to avoid becoming the victims of made-up charges.
Two judicial developments have further convinced men that it is important to be careful to avoid false rape accusations: first, the fact that any rape conviction now carries very long prison terms, often life, or even death.
And second, that the interpretation of what constitutes rape has now been widened extremely. Rape no longer means penile penetration. Rape now tends to be defined as the physical contact of any male body part, or any object used by a man, with any female body opening.
Furthermore, whether any sexual act between a man and a woman is rape or not rape increasingly depends on how the woman chooses to view it any later time.
Women who have participated willingly in a sexual act but later decided that the further development of the relationship wasn't in accordance to their expectations, have an easy time to later claim rape: a day later, a week later, a month later, a year later, or even a decade later.
The life of a man who is legally (and this means: publicly) accused of rape, is ruined anyway, even if he should be proven innocent. Any public debate on whatever sexual practice he may have favored is so embarrassing that he would have to go somewhere where he is unknown in order to resume a normal life.
Unfortunately, men are not organized in political groupings that would protect male gender issues from the feminazi onslaught. While more men are organized in political parties than are women, these traditional political parties concern themselves with everything under the sun, except male gender issues.
The following male gender issues should be pressed:
1. Rape charges should be accepted by law enforcement agencies only within limited filing periods.
2. Rape again ought to be defined in a more narrow sense. There has to be a clear element of force or the threat of force. It should not be sufficient that a woman after the act claims not to have consented.
3. All court cases that involve sexual conduct should be held non-public. While this contradicts the traditional view that only a public trial is fair, a trial on sexual conduct that is turned into a reality show strongly victimizes any male who is accused. A non-public trial doesn't have to be secret. A procedure should be adopted that is comparative to the procedures of juvenile courts, where trials also are not public.
Index of all articles, click here
Copyright Luc Loranhe